Two ladies have sued the authorities for failing to recognise marriages amongst refugees and Kenyans.
In their circumstance submitted together with a human legal rights lobby Haki na Sheria, the two codenamed FYO and FMA argue that regardless of currently being in a marriage with Kenyans for far more than 7 yrs, the government has declined to change their statuses, so denying them an opportunity to are living with their husbands.
In her situation, FYO narrated that she married her partner codenamed AAI, a Kenyan, in 2005. The two have been jointly for at least 17 several years and have 4 kids.
At the exact same time, FMA is a spouse of a Kenyan codenamed AHF. In her court docket papers, she narrates that they have been married for 10 decades.
The two gals dwell at Hagadera Refugee camp in Dadaab. They, nonetheless, lament that their marriages have been set up for failure owing to the prohibitive law.
“Owing to legislative and administrative hurdles highlighted herein, they simply cannot correctly get pleasure from the ideal to citizenship envisaged by the Constitution in Report 15 (1),” their court docket papers submitted by Bashir and Noor Advocates go through in portion.
In the early 1990s, Kenya obtained the major amount of asylum seekers subsequent civil wars in Somalia and South Sudan. Most of them were issued refugee identification cards.
In get to accommodate the significant quantities of refugees, Kenya established Ifo, Dagahaley, Hagadera in Garissa County and afterwards Kakuma refugee camp in Turkana County.
The camps are host to Congo, Rwanda and Ethiopia nationals who escaped war in their dwelling nations.
As adore is familiar with no boundaries, some ended up in marriages with Kenyans. Numerous family members have grown from the unions.
The two gals argue that the regulation does not allow for refugees to have files this sort of as passports and visas, and as a result they simply cannot immigrate if their spouses want to depart the country.
According to court docket paperwork, a foreigner married to a Kenyan is entitled to citizenship if the two have been married for at least seven decades.
On the other hand, the two women argue that refugees’ eligibility for citizenship by means of relationship remains an unsettled challenge.
FYO and FMA have sued Interior Cupboard Secretary, Director-Typical of Citizenship and Immigration Companies, Registrar of Persons and Attorney Basic.
“The petitioners assert that the drafters of the Constitution advertently established citizenship by relationship different from citizenship by residency, consequently offering an inkling as to the relevance of the establishment of relationship as the basis for the formalisation of the spouse and children which is recognised as the basic unit of modern society by Posting 45 of the Structure.
The petitioners contend that Portion 11 of the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act is inconsistent with Content articles 15 (1) and 45 of the Structure in so considerably as it establishes an additional criterion for citizenship by marriage not approved by the Constitution and in truth normally offered for in Posting 15 (2) of the Structure,” courtroom papers filed prior to the Large Court examine.
They want the court to discover that the regulation can make it impossible for refugee spouses to search for citizenship. In accordance to them, it is unlikely for a refugee to even achieve residency status, which is a gateway to citizenship.
“By excluding the refugees from the purview of individuals who could apply for dependent’s pass and permit and basically envisioning only other overseas nationals as eligible candidates for the identical, quantities to a violation of the correct to equality.”